Search for Indicators
Stratified Data
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Significantly better than the overall value
Significantly worse than the overall value
Significantly different than the overall value
No significant difference with the overall value
No data on significance available
Community / Demographics
Foreign Born Persons County: Salt Lake
Foreign Born Persons County: Salt Lake
12.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
UT Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population County: Salt Lake
Veteran Population County: Salt Lake
4.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
UT Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Community / Public Safety
Adults who Wear a Seat Belt County: Salt Lake
Adults who Wear a Seat Belt County: Salt Lake
96.1%
Percent of adults
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 27 Utah counties.
UT Value
(95.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Prior Value
(94.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Community / Public Safety
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions
Value
Compared to:
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions County: Salt Lake
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions County: Salt Lake
9.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021-2023)
Compared to:
UT Value
(9.7)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(12.0 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(9.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)
Community / Transportation
Households without a Vehicle County: Salt Lake
Households without a Vehicle County: Salt Lake
5.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
UT Value
(3.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work County: Salt Lake
Mean Travel Time to Work County: Salt Lake
22.4
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
UT Value
(21.9)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Workers Commuting by Public Transportation County: Salt Lake
Workers Commuting by Public Transportation County: Salt Lake
2.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
UT Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
Workers who Drive Alone to Work County: Salt Lake
Workers who Drive Alone to Work County: Salt Lake
68.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
UT Value
(70.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Workers who Walk to Work County: Salt Lake
Workers who Walk to Work County: Salt Lake
1.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
UT Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Food Insecurity
Food Insecurity Rate County: Salt Lake
Food Insecurity Rate County: Salt Lake
12.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
UT Value
(12.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Housing & Homes
Overcrowded Households County: Salt Lake
Overcrowded Households County: Salt Lake
3.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
UT Value
(3.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Housing & Homes
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent
Value
Compared to:
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent County: Salt Lake
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent County: Salt Lake
47.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
UT Value
(46.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Economy / Income
Median Household Income County: Salt Lake
Median Household Income County: Salt Lake
$90,011
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
UT Value
($86,833)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Per Capita Income County: Salt Lake
Per Capita Income County: Salt Lake
$40,969
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
UT Value
($37,023)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Poverty
Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Salt Lake
Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Salt Lake
8.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
UT Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Families Living Below Poverty Level County: Salt Lake
Families Living Below Poverty Level County: Salt Lake
5.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 28 Utah counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
UT Value
(5.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Salt Lake
People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Salt Lake
6.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
UT Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Salt Lake
People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Salt Lake
8,934
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
People Living Below Poverty Level County: Salt Lake
People Living Below Poverty Level County: Salt Lake
8.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
UT Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
Youth not in School or Working County: Salt Lake
Youth not in School or Working County: Salt Lake
1.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
UT Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Education / Educational Attainment
People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher County: Salt Lake
People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher County: Salt Lake
37.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
UT Value
(36.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Education / Educational Attainment
People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher
Value
Compared to:
People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher County: Salt Lake
People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher County: Salt Lake
91.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
UT Value
(93.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veterans with a High School Diploma or Higher County: Salt Lake
Veterans with a High School Diploma or Higher County: Salt Lake
95.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
UT Value
(96.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(95.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Access to Parks County: Salt Lake
Access to Parks County: Salt Lake
85.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
UT Value
(78.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Prior Value
(73.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
