Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Community Profiles

To view another region, select from the drop-down menu below.
 
The region location type is based on the Utah Department of Health's small statistical areas, which do not line up exactly with city boundaries.

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood Adults who Binge Drink

Current Value:

Region: Cottonwood Adults who Binge Drink

11.8%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to UT Counties, Cottonwood has a value of 11.8% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.1% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.5%.
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 23 Utah counties.
Compared to the UT Value (11.8%), Cottonwood has a value of 11.8%.
UT Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (11.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.8%).
Prior Value
(10.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 40+

Current Value:

Region: Cottonwood Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 40+

65.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to UT Counties, Cottonwood has a value of 65.8% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 61.1% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.1%.
UT Counties
(2018-2020)
The distribution is based on data from 24 Utah counties.
Compared to the UT Value (64.2%), Cottonwood has a value of 65.8% which is higher and better.
UT Value
(64.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (65.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (66.3%).
Prior Value
(66.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Cottonwood Pap Test in Past 3 Years

Current Value:

Region: Cottonwood Pap Test in Past 3 Years

76.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to UT Counties, Cottonwood has a value of 76.2% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.6%.
UT Counties
(2014)
The distribution is based on data from 20 Utah counties.
Compared to the UT Value (58.8%), Cottonwood has a value of 76.2% which is higher and better.
UT Value
(58.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (76.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (59.0%).
Prior Value
(59.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood Adults with Diabetes

Current Value:

Region: Cottonwood Adults with Diabetes

6.2%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to UT Counties, Cottonwood has a value of 6.2% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.8%.
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 26 Utah counties.
Compared to the UT Value (8.7%), Cottonwood has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
UT Value
(8.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (6.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.4%).
Prior Value
(7.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Cottonwood Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Current Value:
14.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the UT Value (26.9), Cottonwood has a value of 14.3 which is lower and better.
UT Value
(26.9)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8), Cottonwood has a value of 14.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (14.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.1).
Prior Value
(14.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood Adults Unable to Afford to See a Doctor

Current Value:
6.8%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to UT Counties, Cottonwood has a value of 6.8% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.7%.
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 26 Utah counties.
Compared to the UT Value (10.7%), Cottonwood has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.
UT Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (6.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.3%).
Prior Value
(4.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Cottonwood Adults with a Usual Source of Health Care

Current Value:
82.5%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to UT Counties, Cottonwood has a value of 82.5% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 77.9% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.3%.
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
Compared to the UT Value (78.7%), Cottonwood has a value of 82.5% which is higher and better.
UT Value
(78.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (82.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (80.0%).
Prior Value
(80.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood Adults who Experienced a Heart Attack, Coronary Heart Disease, or a Stroke

5.3%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to UT Counties, Cottonwood has a value of 5.3% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.8% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.8%.
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 25 Utah counties.
Compared to the UT Value (6.4%), Cottonwood has a value of 5.3% which is lower and better.
UT Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (5.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Cottonwood Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)

32.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to UT Counties, Cottonwood has a value of 32.3 which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.8 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.2.
UT Counties
(2017-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 20 Utah counties.
Compared to the UT Value (32.9), Cottonwood has a value of 32.3 which is lower and better.
UT Value
(32.9)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the US Value (38.8), Cottonwood has a value of 32.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(38.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (32.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (35.2).
Prior Value
(35.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)

Region: Cottonwood Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Disease

Current Value:
120.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to UT Counties, Cottonwood has a value of 120.5 which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 154.9 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 170.2.
UT Counties
(2018-2020)
The distribution is based on data from 27 Utah counties.
Compared to the UT Value (150.6), Cottonwood has a value of 120.5 which is lower and better.
UT Value
(150.6)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the US Value (92.9), Cottonwood has a value of 120.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(92.9 in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (120.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (118.1).
Prior Value
(118.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Cottonwood High Blood Pressure Prevalence

Current Value:

Region: Cottonwood High Blood Pressure Prevalence

21.0%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to UT Counties, Cottonwood has a value of 21.0% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.6% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.5%.
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 26 Utah counties.
Compared to the UT Value (27.3%), Cottonwood has a value of 21.0% which is lower and better.
UT Value
(27.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the US Value (32.4%), Cottonwood has a value of 21.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(32.4% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (21.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.8%).
Prior Value
(22.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (41.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)

Region: Cottonwood High Cholesterol Prevalence

Current Value:

Region: Cottonwood High Cholesterol Prevalence

22.1%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to UT Counties, Cottonwood has a value of 22.1% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.6% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.9%.
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Utah counties.
Compared to the UT Value (24.9%), Cottonwood has a value of 22.1% which is lower and better.
UT Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (22.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.3%).
Prior Value
(27.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood Adults 65+ with Pneumonia Vaccination

Current Value:
76.3%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to UT Counties, Cottonwood has a value of 76.3% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.9% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.9%.
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Utah counties.
Compared to the UT Value (74.6%), Cottonwood has a value of 76.3% which is higher and better.
UT Value
(74.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (76.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (72.0%).
Prior Value
(72.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Cottonwood Adults with Influenza Vaccination

Current Value:
49.9%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to UT Counties, Cottonwood has a value of 49.9% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 37.5% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 30.0%.
UT Counties
(2022)
The distribution is based on data from 26 Utah counties.
Compared to the UT Value (43.5%), Cottonwood has a value of 49.9% which is higher and better.
UT Value
(43.5% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (49.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (44.5%).
Prior Value
(44.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Region: Cottonwood Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia

Current Value:
8.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the UT Value (9.6), Cottonwood has a value of 8.6 which is lower and better.
UT Value
(9.6)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.0), Cottonwood has a value of 8.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.0 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (8.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.7).
Prior Value
(8.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood Adult Days in Poor Mental Health

Current Value:
21.7%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to UT Counties, Cottonwood has a value of 21.7% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.1% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.9%.
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 25 Utah counties.
Compared to the UT Value (23.8%), Cottonwood has a value of 21.7% which is lower and better.
UT Value
(23.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (21.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.3%).
Prior Value
(22.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Cottonwood Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

Current Value:
24.1%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to UT Counties, Cottonwood has a value of 24.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.5% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.0%.
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 27 Utah counties.
Compared to the UT Value (24.5%), Cottonwood has a value of 24.1% which is lower and better.
UT Value
(24.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (24.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.0%).
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Cottonwood Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide

Current Value:
16.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the UT Value (20.6), Cottonwood has a value of 16.5 which is lower and better.
UT Value
(20.6)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5), Cottonwood has a value of 16.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (16.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.6).
Prior Value
(20.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease

Current Value:
40.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the UT Value (39.5), Cottonwood has a value of 40.3 which is higher and worse.
UT Value
(39.5)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the US Value (32.4), Cottonwood has a value of 40.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(32.4 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (40.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (38.8).
Prior Value
(38.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood Adults who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:

Region: Cottonwood Adults who Visited a Dentist

71.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to UT Counties, Cottonwood has a value of 71.3% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 71.2% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.7%.
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 23 Utah counties.
Compared to the UT Value (73.1%), Cottonwood has a value of 71.3% which is lower and worse.
UT Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (71.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (75.2%).
Prior Value
(75.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood Adults with Kidney Disease

Current Value:

Region: Cottonwood Adults with Kidney Disease

3.3%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the UT Value (2.8%), Cottonwood has a value of 3.3% which is higher and worse.
UT Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (3.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.1%).
Prior Value
(4.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Cottonwood Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Kidney Disease

Current Value:
7.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to UT Counties, Cottonwood has a value of 7.6 which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 740.7 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 820.1.
UT Counties
(2018-2020)
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
Compared to the UT Value (13.3), Cottonwood has a value of 7.6 which is lower and better.
UT Value
(13.3)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.7), Cottonwood has a value of 7.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.7 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (7.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.4).
Prior Value
(8.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood Adults Engaging in Regular Physical Activity

Current Value:
27.8%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to UT Counties, Cottonwood has a value of 27.8% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.0% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 21.2%.
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 23 Utah counties.
Compared to the UT Value (23.9%), Cottonwood has a value of 27.8% which is higher and better.
UT Value
(23.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (27.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.2%).
Prior Value
(30.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (29.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(29.7%)
<div>PA-05: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls

Current Value:
11.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the UT Value (13.8), Cottonwood has a value of 11.3 which is lower and better.
UT Value
(13.8)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.3), Cottonwood has a value of 11.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.3 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (11.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.2).
Prior Value
(11.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Cottonwood Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries

Current Value:
38.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to UT Counties, Cottonwood has a value of 38.7 which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.5 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.2.
UT Counties
(2018-2020)
The distribution is based on data from 23 Utah counties.
Compared to the UT Value (48.6), Cottonwood has a value of 38.7 which is lower and better.
UT Value
(48.6)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.6), Cottonwood has a value of 38.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(57.6 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (38.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (29.5).
Prior Value
(29.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.2), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood Adults with COPD

Current Value:

Region: Cottonwood Adults with COPD

3.2%
Percent of adults
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to UT Counties, Cottonwood has a value of 3.2% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.9% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.7%.
UT Counties
(2017-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 23 Utah counties.
Compared to the UT Value (4.3%), Cottonwood has a value of 3.2% which is lower and better.
UT Value
(4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (3.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.8%).
Prior Value
(2.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Cottonwood Adults with Current Asthma

Current Value:

Region: Cottonwood Adults with Current Asthma

8.6%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to UT Counties, Cottonwood has a value of 8.6% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 23 Utah counties.
Compared to the UT Value (10.5%), Cottonwood has a value of 8.6% which is lower and better.
UT Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (8.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.9%).
Prior Value
(7.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood Adults who Smoke

Current Value:

Region: Cottonwood Adults who Smoke

5.9%
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to UT Counties, Cottonwood has a value of 5.9% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.4% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.5%.
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 20 Utah counties.
Compared to the UT Value (8.5%), Cottonwood has a value of 5.9% which is lower and better.
UT Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (5.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.5%).
Prior Value
(6.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood Adults Who Are Obese

Current Value:

Region: Cottonwood Adults Who Are Obese

18.3%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to UT Counties, Cottonwood has a value of 18.3% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.7% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.1%.
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 27 Utah counties.
Compared to the UT Value (31.0%), Cottonwood has a value of 18.3% which is lower and better.
UT Value
(31.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (18.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.5%).
Prior Value
(18.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Cottonwood Adults who are Overweight or Obese

Current Value:
56.8%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to UT Counties, Cottonwood has a value of 56.8% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 64.9% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 68.7%.
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
Compared to the UT Value (65.3%), Cottonwood has a value of 56.8% which is lower and better.
UT Value
(65.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (56.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (52.7%).
Prior Value
(52.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

92.8%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to UT Counties, Cottonwood has a value of 92.8% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.8% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.0%.
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 27 Utah counties.
Compared to the UT Value (87.3%), Cottonwood has a value of 92.8% which is higher and better.
UT Value
(87.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (92.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (92.5%).
Prior Value
(92.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Cottonwood

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

Region: Cottonwood Adults who Wear a Seat Belt

Current Value:

Region: Cottonwood Adults who Wear a Seat Belt

95.0%
Percent of adults
(2015-2017)
Compared to:
Compared to UT Counties, Cottonwood has a value of 95.0% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.1% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.3%.
UT Counties
(2016-2018)
The distribution is based on data from 27 Utah counties.
Compared to the UT Value (94.9%), Cottonwood has a value of 95.0% which is higher and better.
UT Value
(94.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the prior value, Cottonwood (95.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (94.6%).
Prior Value
(94.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cottonwood value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Cottonwood Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions

9.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the UT Value (9.8), Cottonwood has a value of 9.3 which is lower and better.
UT Value
(9.8)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0), Cottonwood has a value of 9.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)