Search for Indicators
Community Health Assessment Data
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Significantly better than the overall value
Significantly worse than the overall value
Significantly different than the overall value
No significant difference with the overall value
No data on significance available
Mental Health
Mental Health
County: Salt Lake
Value
Compared to:
County: Salt Lake Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
County: Salt Lake Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
25.0%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 27 Utah counties.
UT Value
(24.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Prior Value
(24.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Salt Lake Adult Days in Poor Mental Health
County: Salt Lake Adult Days in Poor Mental Health
25.1%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 25 Utah counties.
UT Value
(23.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Prior Value
(24.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Salt Lake Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide
County: Salt Lake Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide
20.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
UT Value
(20.6)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(13.5 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(21.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Salt Lake Depression: Medicare Population
County: Salt Lake Depression: Medicare Population
23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
UT Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Air Quality
Air Quality
County: Salt Lake
Value
Compared to:
County: Salt Lake Workers who Drive Alone to Work
County: Salt Lake Workers who Drive Alone to Work
68.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
UT Value
(70.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Salt Lake Adults with Current Asthma
County: Salt Lake Adults with Current Asthma
10.1%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 23 Utah counties.
UT Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Prior Value
(10.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Salt Lake Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Adult Asthma
County: Salt Lake Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Adult Asthma
12.4
ER visits per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 23 Utah counties.
UT Value
(11.2)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Prior Value
(12.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Substance Use
Substance Use
County: Salt Lake
Value
Compared to:
County: Salt Lake Adults who Binge Drink
County: Salt Lake Adults who Binge Drink
15.4%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 23 Utah counties.
UT Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Prior Value
(6.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Salt Lake Adults who Smoke
County: Salt Lake Adults who Smoke
8.2%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 22 Utah counties.
UT Value
(7.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Prior Value
(8.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Salt Lake Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Substance Use
County: Salt Lake Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Substance Use
40.1
ER visits per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 25 Utah counties.
UT Value
(26.3)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Prior Value
(38.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Exercise & Nutrition
Exercise & Nutrition
County: Salt Lake
Value
Compared to:
County: Salt Lake Adults Engaging in Regular Physical Activity
County: Salt Lake Adults Engaging in Regular Physical Activity
24.4%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 23 Utah counties.
UT Value
(23.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Prior Value
(24.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(29.7%)
<div>PA-05: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Salt Lake Adults who are Overweight or Obese
County: Salt Lake Adults who are Overweight or Obese
65.0%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
UT Value
(65.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Prior Value
(64.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Access to Healthy Foods
Access to Healthy Foods
County: Salt Lake
Value
Compared to:
County: Salt Lake Child Food Insecurity Rate
County: Salt Lake Child Food Insecurity Rate
9.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
UT Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Salt Lake Food Insecurity Rate
County: Salt Lake Food Insecurity Rate
9.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
UT Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Heart Disease & Stroke
Heart Disease & Stroke
County: Salt Lake
Value
Compared to:
6.5%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 25 Utah counties.
UT Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Prior Value
(5.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Salt Lake High Cholesterol Prevalence
County: Salt Lake High Cholesterol Prevalence
25.0%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Utah counties.
UT Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Prior Value
(24.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Salt Lake Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Failure
County: Salt Lake Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Failure
21.1
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Utah counties.
UT Value
(18.3)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Prior Value
(21.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Salt Lake Stroke: Medicare Population
County: Salt Lake Stroke: Medicare Population
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
UT Value
(4.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Diabetes
Diabetes
County: Salt Lake
Value
Compared to:
County: Salt Lake Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes
County: Salt Lake Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes
13.4
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Utah counties.
UT Value
(12.8)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Prior Value
(13.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Salt Lake Adults with Diabetes
County: Salt Lake Adults with Diabetes
9.1%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 26 Utah counties.
UT Value
(8.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Salt Lake Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes
County: Salt Lake Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes
28.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
UT Value
(26.9)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(26.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Access to Healthcare
Access to Healthcare
County: Salt Lake
Value
Compared to:
County: Salt Lake Adults Unable to Afford to See a Doctor
County: Salt Lake Adults Unable to Afford to See a Doctor
11.6%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 26 Utah counties.
UT Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Prior Value
(12.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Salt Lake Adults with a Usual Source of Health Care
County: Salt Lake Adults with a Usual Source of Health Care
77.8%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
UT Value
(78.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Prior Value
(75.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Cancer
Cancer
County: Salt Lake
Value
Compared to:
County: Salt Lake Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Salt Lake Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
120.3
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Utah counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,478 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
UT Value
(115.5)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(121.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Salt Lake Melanoma Incidence Rate
County: Salt Lake Melanoma Incidence Rate
38.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 23 Utah counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,961 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
UT Value
(40.8)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(22.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(39.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Salt Lake Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Salt Lake Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
103.1
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 25 Utah counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,500 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
UT Value
(117.4)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(101.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Maternal & Child Health
Maternal & Child Health
County: Salt Lake
Value
Compared to:
County: Salt Lake Babies with Low Birthweight
County: Salt Lake Babies with Low Birthweight
7.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
UT Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(7.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Salt Lake Teen Birth Rate: 15-19
County: Salt Lake Teen Birth Rate: 15-19
12.6
Live births per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2021)
Compared to:
UT Value
(9.2)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(13.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
Prior Value
(14.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Salt Lake Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care
County: Salt Lake Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care
70.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 27 Utah counties.
UT Value
(79.6% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(78.3% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(74.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Unintentional Injuries
Unintentional Injuries
County: Salt Lake
Value
Compared to:
County: Salt Lake Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls
County: Salt Lake Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls
13.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
UT Value
(13.8)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(10.3 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(13.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Salt Lake Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries
County: Salt Lake Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries
49.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
UT Counties
(2018-2020)
The distribution is based on data from 23 Utah counties.
UT Value
(48.6)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(57.6 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(48.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
County: Salt Lake Adults who Wear a Seat Belt
County: Salt Lake Adults who Wear a Seat Belt
96.1%
Percent of adults
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 27 Utah counties.
UT Value
(95.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Prior Value
(94.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Infectious Disease
Infectious Disease
County: Salt Lake
Value
Compared to:
1.7
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
UT Counties
(2019-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 20 Utah counties.
UT Value
(1.6)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
Prior Value
(2.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Salt Lake Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
County: Salt Lake Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
197.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,117 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
UT Value
(108.5)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(214.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(171.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Salt Lake Chlamydia Incidence Rate
County: Salt Lake Chlamydia Incidence Rate
491.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
UT Counties
The distribution is based on data from 29 Utah counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,800 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
UT Value
(336.2)
The regional value is compared to the Utah State value.
US Value
(495.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(469.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
